Is it my fault: does the remake conquer or disappoint?

It is my fault, London, she is the English remake of the successful saga taken from the books of Mercedes Ron and from February 13 we can take advantage of it thanks to first videos. Trust, because when we say we can use it we do not use random words. Why see Matthew Broome (Nick) e Asha Banks (Noah) Together it is really a pleasure. The question is: has it convinced us is my fault-London?

It's my fault – London: plot and cast.

Little to say, the plot is always the same, where Noah (Asha Banks) moves to the house of Nick (Broome) following the marriage of their parents. A past marked by a father of whom we speak veiledly and with fear, but this time with knowledge of the cause making us know that pain, and an unexpected future, to be consolidated together with a sudden love. We are talking about a remake so let's not go too far in banality. The cast sees as protagonists Matthew Broome e Asha Bankswho convince us immediately. The crazy chemistry between the two then helps to enjoy the film pleasantly, hoping never ends. Yes, even if we know how it ends (or maybe not, but we talk about this shortly). The main duo is then surrounded by Eve Macklin, Ray Fearon, Sam Buchanan, e Jason Flemyng That yes, they convince us much more than the Spanish counterparties.

Today I want to speak for the first time in the first person, so as to explain the point of view at the best possible.

It was February 16, 2025, a few days ago, when, not knowing what to look at me, I came across My Fault: London. At first glance I thought not to look at it, because the original had already made me angry enough (as it is clear how the sun how they left out all the most important themes of the book). Then I thought: “But who am I to prevent me at 32 years of looking at umpteenth” Rom-com “with the” Bad Boy Toxic “that makes boxing and clandestine races”? Result: I ate that movie, without ever taking my eyes. For 3 simple reasons.

My Fault London: 3 reasons why it is better than the original

1. The plot: Very trivially we are faced with a more dynamic story and the least crunch. I said it! Do we want to talk about the ending? Without spoilers, it is much more realistic than that rally on a bridge at the port, in which not even Ayrton Senna would have come out without accidents, suvvia. Not to mention the final cliffhanger decidedly more direct to the goal than the Spanish film.
2. The protagonist duo: I will be countercurrent girl*, but they are definitely more convincing. The chemistry is there, you see, it is palpated in every scene and, above all, the toxic side shines through less. Just rude this thing! This is to connect directly to point three.
3. The relationship between Noah and Nick: The English protagonist duo is definitely more “skin” than the original one. We are not here to judge which is more consistent with the novels, because we just want to say which the public convinces, at least for us (for me). Nicole Wallace e Gabriel Guevara They characterize a more quarrelsome couple, more toxic, more dependent on each other, but in a negative way. A relationship that we are seeing in several films and series, always in different sauces but which is always the same at the base. There are few products that speak of a daily love, of a love that normally arises at first glance, without the need for too many “trope” stereotyped in the outline.

Nobody Wants This It is a fitting example of what I'm talking about. Not that in my fault: London, there is no “Trope”, but it talks about it lighter. He does not promote love dependence to young adults who then seek the impossible in their daily lives.

What can I say girl*, for us it is a full 7.5 this film and we can't wait to have a sequel (wishing us there is and that it is better than the second Spanish film).

Post Views: 0